UNVEILING THE SILENT SUFFERINGS OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE AND FOOD SECURITY – A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE

Abdul Munim Choudhury, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, The ICFAI University, Tripura

T. A. Choudhury, Assistant Professor, Ajmal Law College, Hojai

ABSTRACT

Food security and gender-based violence (GBV) are two important concerns that intricately interact, yet little is known about how they are related. This study aims to clarify the complex relationship between gender-based violence and food security, bringing attention to the pain that many people go unnoticed-women and marginalized groups in particular. This study's conceptual framework outlines the complex relationship between GBV and food security. The study examines current literature and theoretical frameworks to examine the many types of gender-based violence (GBV) and how they affect food access, livelihoods, and nutrition. Additionally, the relationships between GBV and food insecurity are explored, showing how violent encounters can cause and result from food hardship. Poverty, prejudice, and restricted access to resources are examples of structural inequality that strengthen this vicious circle of vulnerability.GBV has significant and wide-ranging effects on food security that impact people individually, in their homes, and in their communities. Consequences in terms of health, mental health, and finances exacerbate an already existing cycle of poverty and instability, making it more difficult to attain social justice and sustainable development. The study concludes by examining methods for resolving GBV in order to enhance the results of food security. This covers community-based strategies, policy interventions, and empowerment programs designed to fight gender-based violence and advance gender equality. This research helps to build comprehensive, rights-based solutions to both urgent global concerns by identifying and addressing the intersecting elements that sustain both food insecurity and GBV. Furthermore, the paper examines the legal dimensions pertaining to gender-based violence (GBV) and food security in India. It provides insights into the legislative framework and court precedents, and evaluates their efficacy in tackling these concerns.

       Keywords: Gender based violence, Food security, Intersectionality, inequality, legal dimension.

INTRODUCTION

In the intricate tapestry of global challenges, the intersectionality of gender-based violence (GBV) and food security represents an urgent and underexplored facet of human well-being. This research endeavours to shed light on the pervasive yet often overlooked connection between GBV and the ability of individuals and communities to secure an adequate and nutritious food supply. As the world grapples with complex socio-economic issues, this study delves into the profound impacts of gender-based violence on food security, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive understanding and targeted interventions. Gender-based violence, encompassing physical, sexual, psychological, and economic abuse rooted in gender inequalities, transcends cultural, geographic, and economic boundaries. It affects millions of individuals globally, particularly women and marginalized groups, hindering not only their physical safety but also impeding their access to essential resources, including food (Ekanayake, 2003). Despite the intimate link between GBV and food security, a notable research gap persists in comprehensively exploring the nuanced dynamics and implications of this intersection.

Food security, a fundamental human right, encompasses not only the availability and accessibility of sufficient food but also the consistent access to nutritionally adequate and safe sustenance. Beyond the immediate implications for health, GBV introduces a layer of vulnerability that disrupts the delicate balance necessary for individuals to enjoy this basic right. This research aims to uncover the mechanisms through which gender-based violence acts as a silent disruptor of food security, delving into the intricate web of social, economic, and cultural factors that perpetuate this cycle of suffering (Tripathy & Mishra, 2011).

The overarching objective of this study is to contribute empirical evidence and nuanced insights that inform policies and interventions addressing the interconnected issues of gender-based violence and food security. By uncovering the silent suffering endured by victims of GBV, we aim to amplify the voices of the marginalized and advocate for comprehensive strategies that not only address the immediate consequences but also disrupt the root causes of this vicious cycle. As we embark on this exploration, it is crucial to recognize the multifaceted nature of the challenges at hand and approach our analysis with sensitivity to cultural nuances, ensuring that our findings are applicable and adaptable across diverse global contexts. Through this research, we aspire to not only deepen our understanding of the intricacies surrounding GBV and food security but also catalyse actionable steps towards a more equitable and secure world.

OBJECTIVE OF THE RESEARCH

The objectives of the Research are as follows:

1. To Investigate the Interconnections: Examine the interrelationships between gender-based violence (GBV) and food security, exploring how GBV affects food security and vice versa.

2. To Understand the Conceptual Framework: Develop a comprehensive understanding of the conceptual framework surrounding GBV and food security, including the social, economic, and cultural factors influencing this relationship.

3. To Identify Consequences: Determine the consequences of GBV on food security, including its impact on individuals' access to food, nutritional status, and ability to engage in food production activities.

4. To Analyze Legal Aspects: Explore the legal frameworks addressing GBV and food security in India, assessing their effectiveness in protecting victims and promoting food security.

5. To Propose Solutions: Recommend strategies for addressing GBV to improve food security outcomes, including policy interventions, community-based initiatives, and advocacy efforts.

METHODOLOGY

This comprehensive study aims to bridge academic, governmental, and NGO research on Gender-Based Violence (GBV) and food security, synthesizing existing literature to develop a theoretical framework while pinpointing knowledge gaps. Through quantitative analysis, it seeks to establish correlations between GBV and food security indicators, supplemented by qualitative thematic analysis to unearth nuanced insights. Additionally, a legal examination will evaluate Indian GBV and food security laws and policies, scrutinizing coverage, implementation, victim protection, and promotion of food security. By delving into real-life GBV interventions and their impact on food security through case studies, this research endeavours to identify effective tactics and critical lessons for improving interventions in this critical intersection of social issues.

1. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE (GBV) AND FOOD SECURITY

The conceptual framework of this research delves into the multifaceted relationship between GBV and food security, recognizing the profound impact on individuals, households, and communities.

Conceptual Framework: Gender-Based Violence (GBV) and Food Security

a)    Understanding Gender-Based Violence (GBV):

GBV encompasses various forms of violence directed at an individual based on their gender. This includes physical, sexual, emotional, and economic abuse. The conceptual framework acknowledges the power dynamics embedded in societies that contribute to the perpetuation of GBV.

b)    Impact on Food Security:

GBV has far-reaching consequences on food security, affecting both men and women differently. Women, often the primary caregivers and food producers, may experience reduced access to resources, control over productive assets, and limited decision-making power(Ekanayake, 2003).GBV can disrupt agricultural activities, leading to decreased productivity and compromised food availability.

c)     Economic Implications:

The framework recognizes the economic dimensions of GBV, where survivors may face economic hardship, poverty, and limited access to income-generating opportunities. This economic vulnerability directly correlates with diminished purchasing power, hindering access to nutritious food and compromising overall food security(FAO, 1990).

d)    Psycho-social Factors:

GBV contributes to psycho-social stressors that impact mental health and well-being. Survivors may experience trauma, depression, and anxiety, affecting their capacity to engage in productive activities, make informed decisions, and actively participate in securing food for themselves and their families (FAO, 2016).

e)     Household Dynamics:

The conceptual framework explores how GBV disrupts household dynamics. Fear of violence may influence household members’ behaviour, leading to suboptimal resource allocation, unequal distribution of food, and compromised nutritional outcomes, particularly for women and children (FAO, 2017).

f)      Policy and Institutional Context:

Acknowledging the influence of broader societal structures, the framework considers the role of policies, laws, and institutional frameworks in addressing GBV and promoting food security. It emphasizes the importance of gender-responsive interventions to break the cycle of violence and improve food access and utilization.

g)    Empowerment and Resilience:

The framework underscores the significance of empowerment strategies to mitigate the impacts of GBV on food security. Strengthening women’s agency, providing support services, and fostering community resilience are crucial elements in promoting sustainable solutions.

In conclusion, the conceptual framework provides a comprehensive lens through which the research examines the intricate relationship between GBV and food security. By unravelling the silent suffering caused by GBV, the study aims to inform policy and intervention strategies that address both the immediate needs of survivors and the structural inequalities perpetuating these challenges, ultimately working towards a more equitable and food-secure future.

2. INTERCONNECTIONS BETWEEN FOOD INSECURITY AND GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE (GBV)

This paper delves into the intricate interconnections between food insecurity and gender-based violence (GBV), recognizing the complex ways in which these two critical issues mutually reinforce and exacerbate each other.

Interconnections between Food Insecurity and Gender-Based Violence:

a)    Economic Disempowerment and Food Access:

GBV often results in economic disempowerment, particularly for women who may face restrictions on employment, education, and control over resources. Economic vulnerability, in turn, limits access to food and proper nutrition. The inability to earn income or control financial resources directly impacts a woman's ability to secure food for herself and her family(GBV AoR Helpdesk, 2021).

b)    Violence as a Tool of Control:

In some instances, GBV is used as a tool of control within households. Perpetrators may deliberately manipulate access to food as a means of exerting dominance. Controlling or restricting food resources becomes a tactic to coerce and subjugate, leaving survivors vulnerable to both physical violence and hunger (Edholm, Harris, & Young, 1977).

c)     Disruption of Agricultural Livelihoods:

For communities’ dependent on agriculture, GBV can disrupt agricultural livelihoods. Violence may force women, who are often primary agricultural workers, to abandon fields or limit their participation in farming activities. This can lead to reduced agricultural productivity, affecting food availability and overall household food security (FAO, 2017).

d)    Nutritional Impacts on Survivors:

GBV can have direct nutritional consequences for survivors. Physical violence or emotional trauma may contribute to stress-related health issues, eating disorders, or other conditions that compromise an individual's nutritional status. The repercussions of GBV extend beyond immediate safety concerns to impact long-term health and well-being(Lentz, Narayanan, & De, cited in GBV AoR HelpDesk, 2022).

e)     Forced Migration and Displacement:

GBV can contribute to forced migration and displacement, disrupting communities and their ability to sustain themselves. Displaced populations often face heightened food insecurity due to the loss of homes, livelihoods, and social networks. The vulnerability of displaced individuals, particularly women and children, increases the risk of further GBV and food insecurity (World Bank, n.d.).

f)      Limited Decision-Making Power:

The power dynamics inherent in GBV often result in women having limited decision-making power within households. This includes decisions related to food choices, meal planning, and allocation of resources. Limited agency in these matters can lead to inadequate food distribution and compromised nutritional outcomes.

g)    Cyclical Nature of GBV and Food Insecurity:

The relationship between GBV and food insecurity is often cyclical. Food insecurity can create stress and tension within households, contributing to an environment conducive to violence. Conversely, the trauma and disempowerment resulting from GBV can perpetuate the cycle of poverty and food insecurity.

h)    Community and Societal Impact:

GBV affects not only individuals but also the broader community and society. A culture of violence and discrimination hampers community development efforts, including initiatives aimed at improving food security. Addressing GBV becomes integral to building resilient and sustainable communities(FAO, n.d.).

By unveiling the interconnections between food insecurity and GBV, the research seeks to underscore the urgency of holistic interventions. Efforts to enhance food security must go hand-in-hand with initiatives addressing the root causes of GBV, promoting gender equality, and creating environments where individuals, irrespective of gender, can lead violence-free and nourished lives. This integrated approach is essential for breaking the cycle of suffering and fostering enduring positive change.

3. CONSEQUENCES OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE ON FOOD SECURITY

The research paper discusses the profound consequences of gender-based violence (GBV) on food security. Recognizing the intricate interplay between these two critical issues, the study sheds light on the multifaceted impacts that GBV has on individuals, households, and communities, rippling through various dimensions of food security.

Consequences of Gender-Based Violence on Food Security:

a)    Reduced Agricultural Productivity:

GBV often disrupts women's participation in agricultural activities, limiting their ability to contribute to farming and cultivation. Reduced agricultural productivity directly affects food availability, as women, who are primary contributors to agricultural labour in many contexts, may be constrained in their capacity to engage in productive activities.

b)    Limited Access to Resources:

Women facing GBV often experience restricted access to resources such as land, seeds, and agricultural inputs. The control exerted by perpetrators hampers women's ability to manage and utilize resources efficiently. Limited access to these crucial inputs directly impedes agricultural productivity and, consequently, household food security.

c)     Economic Disempowerment:

GBV contributes to economic disempowerment, as survivors may face challenges in pursuing education, employment, or income-generating activities. The economic fallout limits their purchasing power and ability to access nutritious food. Economic disempowerment resulting from GBV becomes a barrier to achieving food security for survivors and their families.

d)    Food Entitlement and Control:

Perpetrators of GBV may use control over food as a means of asserting dominance and reinforcing power imbalances within households. Survivors may be deliberately deprived of food, or perpetrators may dictate what, when, and how much they can eat. This control extends to the realm of food entitlement and has direct implications for the nutritional well-being of survivors.

e)     Impact on Maternal and Child Nutrition:

Pregnant women facing GBV may experience heightened health risks, impacting maternal and child nutrition. The stress and trauma associated with violence can contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes and hinder breastfeeding practices. Children born into households affected by GBV may face nutritional deficiencies with long-term consequences for their health and development.

f)      Health Consequences:

GBV can lead to various physical and mental health consequences, affecting an individual's overall well-being. Survivors may experience injuries, chronic health conditions, and mental health disorders. The resulting health challenges can limit an individual's ability to engage in productive activities, including securing food for themselves and their families.

g)    Displacement and Loss of Livelihoods:

GBV can contribute to forced displacement, disrupting communities and causing the loss of homes and livelihoods. Displaced populations face heightened vulnerability to food insecurity due to the breakdown of social networks, loss of income-generating opportunities, and limited access to resources.

h)    Psychosocial Stress and Coping Mechanisms:

Survivors of GBV often experience psychosocial stress, impacting their mental health and coping mechanisms. In the context of food security, stress can influence eating patterns, dietary choices, and the ability to plan and prepare nutritious meals. Maladaptive coping mechanisms, such as substance abuse or disordered eating, may further compromise nutritional well-being.

i)      Inter-generational Impact:

The consequences of GBV extend to future generations, as the trauma and disruption caused by violence can impact the health and well-being of children. Children raised in households marked by GBV may be more vulnerable to malnutrition, perpetuating a cycle of food insecurity across generations.

Understanding the multifaceted consequences of GBV on food security is crucial for developing comprehensive interventions. Efforts to address GBV and enhance food security must be integrated and consider the unique challenges faced by survivors. Policy initiatives, community-based programs, and support services that empower survivors and promote gender equality are essential components in breaking the cycle of silent suffering and fostering resilient, nourished communities.

4. ADDRESSING GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE TO IMPROVE FOOD SECURITY

The research paper underscores the imperative of addressing gender-based violence (GBV) as a fundamental step toward improving food security. Recognizing the intricate interconnections between these two critical issues, the study advocates for holistic interventions that promote gender equality, empower survivors, and create environments conducive to sustainable food security.

Addressing Gender-Based Violence to Improve Food Security:

a)    Promoting Gender Equality:

A key strategy in addressing GBV and enhancing food security is the promotion of gender equality. This involves dismantling discriminatory social norms, challenging stereotypes, and ensuring equitable access to resources, education, and economic opportunities for all genders. Empowering women and challenging traditional power structures are pivotal steps in fostering environments where violence is less likely to occur.

b)    Legal and Policy Frameworks:

Strengthening legal and policy frameworks is essential for addressing GBV and promoting food security. Governments and institutions should enact and enforce laws that criminalize GBV, protect survivors, and ensure equal rights for all. Policies that explicitly integrate gender considerations into food security initiatives can contribute to more inclusive and effective interventions.

c)     Community Awareness and Sensitization:

Community-based awareness campaigns play a crucial role in challenging cultural norms that perpetuate GBV. By fostering a culture of respect, empathy, and gender sensitivity, communities can contribute to reducing instances of violence. Additionally, awareness programs can highlight the impact of GBV on food security, encouraging collective efforts for positive change.

d)    Access to Education and Economic Opportunities:

Education and economic empowerment are powerful tools in breaking the cycle of GBV and improving food security. Ensuring equal access to education for all genders promotes awareness, autonomy, and the capacity to challenge discriminatory practices. Economic empowerment, through skill-building and income-generating opportunities, enhances the ability of survivors to secure food and support their families independently.

e)     Safe Spaces and Support Services:

Establishing safe spaces and support services for survivors of GBV is critical. These spaces provide refuge, counselling, and resources for survivors to rebuild their lives. Integrating nutritional support and livelihood training within these services enhances the resilience and recovery of survivors, addressing the broader impacts of GBV on food security.

f)      Gender-Responsive Agricultural Practices:

In agricultural contexts, adopting gender-responsive practices is vital for improving food security. Recognizing and valuing the contributions of women in agriculture, ensuring their access to resources, and integrating gender considerations into agricultural policies contribute to increased productivity and sustainable food systems.

g)    Capacity Building and Training:

Capacity building and training programs are essential components of addressing GBV and improving food security. Training community leaders, healthcare professionals, and service providers to identify and respond to GBV effectively ensures a supportive ecosystem. Additionally, capacity building in sustainable agricultural practices enhances communities' ability to produce and access nutritious food.

h)    Research and Data Collection:

Research initiatives that explore the nuanced connections between GBV and food security are critical for informed policy and program development. Robust data collection, disaggregated by gender, can unveil hidden patterns, inform evidence-based interventions, and guide the allocation of resources to address the root causes of both GBV and food insecurity.

i)      Cross-Sectoral Collaboration:

Addressing the complex interplay between GBV and food security requires collaboration across sectors. Organizations working in gender advocacy, agriculture, health, and social services must collaborate to develop comprehensive strategies. Cross-sectoral partnerships can amplify the impact of interventions and contribute to lasting systemic change.

j)     Empowering Local Communities:

Empowering local communities to design and implement their own solutions is a key principle in addressing GBV and improving food security. Tailoring interventions to the unique needs and cultural contexts of communities ensures relevance and sustainability, fostering a sense of ownership and collective responsibility.

By integrating these strategies, the research paper seeks to contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the intricate relationship between GBV and food security. Ultimately, addressing GBV is not only a matter of human rights but also a prerequisite for achieving sustainable and equitable food security, laying the foundation for healthier, more resilient communities.

5. LEGAL ASPECTS OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE AND FOOD SECURITY IN INDIA

India, a country known for its rich cultural tapestry, confronts the intricate intersection of gender-based violence (GBV) and food security. This nuanced interplay underscores a global concern that takes centre stage in the exploration within this paper. In understanding the depth of these issues, it becomes imperative to dissect the legal landscape of India, where legislation serves as a crucial instrument in unravelling and addressing these complex, interconnected challenges. The legal framework in India stands as a dynamic response to the multifaceted dimensions of gender-based violence. Landmark legislations such as the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, and the Dowry Prohibition Act collectively endeavour to safeguard the rights of women and marginalized groups. Simultaneously, India's legal architecture recognizes the fundamental right to food security through legislations like the National Food Security Act, Integrated Child Development Services Scheme, and the Mid-Day Meal Scheme. This legal tapestry not only represents a commitment to addressing gender-based violence and ensuring food security but also reflects an evolving understanding of the intricate links between the two. Legislation, as a cornerstone, plays a pivotal role in shaping a more equitable and secures future for individuals and communities grappling with these intertwined challenges in the Indian context.

India's legal landscape reflects a dedicated effort to combat gender-based violence (GBV) through comprehensive legislation. Several pivotal acts stand out in addressing different facets of GBV, ensuring legal protection and recourse for survivors.

a)     The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (2005): This ground-breaking legislation is a cornerstone in the fight against domestic violence. Acknowledging the diverse forms of abuse, including physical, emotional, economic, and sexual, it empowers women to seek redressal. The Act goes beyond traditional definitions, recognizing economic dimensions by allowing survivors to obtain protection orders, residence orders, and financial relief. By addressing economic coercion within domestic settings, it takes a crucial step in dismantling the power dynamics that contribute to sustained abuse.

b)    The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act (2013): Aiming to foster safe working environments, this legislation is a significant stride in addressing sexual harassment. It mandates the creation of internal committees in workplaces to investigate complaints and ensures redressal for survivors. By focusing on prevention, prohibition, and redressal, the Act recognizes the importance of a secure workplace free from harassment. It not only provides legal mechanisms for survivors but also contributes to changing workplace cultures, emphasizing the right to work in a violence-free environment.

c)     The Dowry Prohibition Act (1961): Targeting the deep-rooted issue of dowry-related violence, this Act takes a stand against a harmful practice that often leads to economic coercion and abuse. By prohibiting the giving or taking of dowry, the legislation aims to eradicate a societal norm that has perpetuated violence against women, particularly within marital relationships. Recognizing the economic dimensions of dowry-related violence, it addresses a significant aspect of GBV prevalent in Indian society.

d)    Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (2013): Enacted as a response to the Nirbhaya case, this amendment represents a comprehensive overhaul of laws related to sexual offenses, including rape. It significantly expanded the definition of sexual assault, enhanced penalties, and introduced new offenses. The amendment reflects a commitment to combating sexual violence by addressing loopholes in the legal system and acknowledging the evolving nature of offenses. It underscores the government's dedication to providing survivors with stronger legal tools for seeking justice.

Despite these legislative strides, challenges persist in the effective implementation and enforcement of these laws. Underreporting, societal stigma, and a complex judicial process often act as barriers to justice for survivors of GBV.

Legal Nexus with Food Security: The legal landscape regarding food security in India is multifaceted, with key legislations addressing different dimensions of this complex issue:

a)    National Food Security Act (2013): This landmark legislation aims to provide subsidized food grains to approximately two-thirds of India's population. It recognizes the right to food as a basic human right and seeks to ensure food security by addressing issues of availability, accessibility, and affordability.

b)    Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme: While not a standalone law, the ICDS scheme plays a crucial role in ensuring the nutritional well-being of women and children. It provides supplementary nutrition, healthcare, and pre-school education, directly impacting food security at the grassroots level.

c)     Mid-Day Meal Scheme (MDMS): Aimed at promoting universalization of elementary education, MDMS provides cooked meals to school children. Beyond its educational objectives, the scheme contributes to food security by addressing nutritional needs and enhancing school attendance.

d)    Intersectionality in Legal Approaches: Recognizing the intersectionality of GBV and food security, legal initiatives have started acknowledging the broader implications of violence on a woman's ability to access and secure food.

Courts in India have increasingly recognized the linkage between GBV and the right to food. Notable judgments emphasize the importance of ensuring a violence-free environment for women to enjoy their constitutional rights, including the right to food. While legislative measures provide a framework for addressing gender-based violence (GBV) and ensuring food security in India, landmark judgments by the Supreme Court have played a crucial role in interpreting and reinforcing the legal principles. Several judgments have set significant precedents, emphasizing the protection of women's rights, dignity, and equitable access to resources:

Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan (1997): This ground-breaking judgment laid down guidelines to combat sexual harassment at the workplace, filling a legislative void. The court held that employers are obligated to prevent and address sexual harassment, ensuring a safe working environment for women. The decision was instrumental in shaping subsequent legislation, including the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act (2013).

Lalitha Kumari v. Government of U.P. (2014): In the context of criminal law, this judgment clarified the mandatory registration of First Information Reports (FIRs) in cognizable offenses. It emphasized the right to fair and just investigation, ensuring that complaints of gender-based violence are promptly and impartially dealt with by law enforcement agencies.

Rajesh Sharma v. State of U.P. (2017): While this judgment initially faced criticism for its stance on misuse of anti-dowry laws, it spurred conversations around the need for nuanced legal approaches. Subsequently, the legislature intervened, and the Supreme Court re-examined its position, emphasizing the importance of fair investigation and protection against false accusations in dowry-related cases.

State of Maharashtra v. Madhkar Narayan Mardikar (1991): This judgment is significant in the context of the right to food security. The court recognized the right to live, which includes the right to food, as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. While not specific to any legislation, it sets the foundation for understanding the constitutional underpinning of the right to food security.

Common Cause v. Union of India (2018): While primarily addressing issues related to the right to die with dignity, this judgment reaffirms the constitutional principles of human dignity, autonomy, and the right to a dignified life. These principles are integral to discussions on women's rights and protection against gender-based violence.

PUCL v. Union of India (2001): In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of India interpreted the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution to include the right to food. The court recognized that the government has a constitutional obligation to ensure the right to food for all citizens, especially the marginalized and vulnerable populations.

People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India & Others (2003): This case, often referred to as the "Right to Food case," addressed the issue of hunger deaths in the state of Rajasthan. The Supreme Court directed the government to implement various food security schemes to ensure that no person dies of starvation. It emphasized the importance of efficient food distribution systems and social safety nets.

National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) v. State of Arunachal Pradesh (2018): In this case, the NHRC took suo moto cognizance of media reports about the death of a girl due to starvation in Arunachal Pradesh. The NHRC highlighted the failure of the state government to ensure food security and directed it to take immediate action to prevent such incidents in the future.

People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India & Others (2013): This case focused on the implementation of the National Food Security Act (NFSA) 2013. The Supreme Court issued directions to the central and state governments to effectively implement the NFSA and ensure that food grains reach the intended beneficiaries under various food security schemes.

Swati Singh & Others v. State of NCT of Delhi (2019): In this case, the Delhi High Court directed the state government to ensure the provision of cooked mid-day meals to all eligible students in government schools. The court emphasized the importance of nutritional security for children and the need for the state to fulfil its obligation in this regard.

These judgments collectively contribute to the evolving legal landscape, reinforcing constitutional values and ensuring that legal measures align with the principles of justice, equality, and dignity. They serve as beacons in navigating the complexities of addressing GBV and promoting food security in India, shaping the contours of legal discourse and practice.

6. CONCLUSION

In the realm of global challenges, the intersectionality of gender-based violence (GBV) and food security emerges as a critical, yet often overlooked, facet of human well-being. This research has endeavoured to illuminate the intricate connections between GBV and the ability of individuals and communities to secure adequate and nutritious food, emphasizing the urgent need for comprehensive understanding and targeted interventions. The conceptual framework provided a comprehensive lens to examine the complex relationship between GBV and food security, unravelling the silent suffering endured by victims and aiming to inform policies and interventions that address both immediate needs and structural inequalities. The subsequent exploration of interconnections unveiled the cyclical nature of the relationship, emphasizing the urgency of holistic interventions that address root causes and promote gender equality.

The consequences of GBV on food security, as discussed, are profound and multifaceted, affecting individuals, households, and communities. From reduced agricultural productivity to intergenerational impacts, the research highlighted the far-reaching implications that perpetuate a cycle of poverty and instability. It imperatives to address GBV to improve food security became evident in the subsequent section, outlining strategies ranging from promoting gender equality and legal frameworks to community awareness, education, and cross-sectoral collaboration. These strategies collectively form a roadmap toward fostering environments conducive to sustainable food security, emphasizing empowerment, support services, and gender-responsive practices.In essence, this research seeks to amplify the voices of the marginalized, advocating for comprehensive strategies that not only address the immediate consequences of GBV but also disrupt the root causes of this vicious cycle. The findings contribute empirical evidence and nuanced insights to inform policies and interventions, aspiring to catalyse actionable steps towards a more equitable and secure world.

As we conclude this exploration, it is imperative to recognize the multifaceted nature of the challenges at hand. Approaching our analysis with sensitivity to cultural nuances ensures that our findings are applicable and adaptable across diverse global contexts. Through this research, we aspire not only to deepen our understanding of the intricacies surrounding GBV and food security but also to catalyse transformative change. By dismantling the barriers that perpetuate this silent suffering, we can pave the way for a future where individuals, irrespective of gender, can lead violence-free and nourished lives. This integrated approach aligns with the pursuit of social justice and sustainable development, laying the groundwork for healthier, more resilient communities and a world where the silent suffering is unveiled and addressed.

REFERENCES1. Ekanayake, C. R. (2003). Role of Civil Society, Peoples Participation, Gender Equality, Democratization, Food Emergency and Aid. In P. Chaturvedi (Ed.), Food Security in South Asia (p. 57). New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.

2. Tripathy, K. K., & Mishra, K. C. (2011). Food Security in India: Policy Issues and Challenges. Kurukshetra, 59(5), 14-20.

3. FAO, (1990). “Food Security Issues in West African Past Lesions and Future Prospects”, A Critical Review, FAO Economic and Social Development, paper, No. 93, United Nation.

4. FAO. (2016). How can food security interventions contribute to reducing gender-based violence? Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7768e.pdf

5. FAO. (2017, November 27). Gender-based violence affects food security and nutrition: Interview with FAO’s Deputy Director-General, Daniel Gustafson. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/fao-stories/article/en/c/1069792/

6. GBV AoR Helpdesk. (2021, November). Brief overview of research, evidence and learning on the links between food insecurity and gender-based violence in conflict-affected settings.

7. Edholm, F., Harris, O., & Young, K. (1977). Conceptualizing Women. Critique of Anthropology, 3(9&10), 101–130.

8. FAO. (2017). Protection from gender-based violence in food security and agricultural interventions: A guide for FAO and partner staff. Rome.

9. Lentz, E. C., Narayanan, S., & De, A. Last and least: Findings on intra household under nutrition from participatory research in South Asia. Cited in GBV AoR Helpdesk: GBV Risks, Food Insecurity, and the Integrated Food Security Classification – What Are Basics that Food Security and GBV Actors Need to Know? (Aug 2022).

10. World Bank. (Year not provided). Forced Displacement: Refugees, Internally Displaced, and Host Communities. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/forced-displacement

11. FAO. Gender-based violence affects food security and nutrition: Interview with FAO’s Deputy Director-General, Daniel Gustafson. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/fao-stories/article/en/c/1069792/

12. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, No. 43 of 2005.

13. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, No. 14 of 2013.

14. The Dowry Prohibition Act, No. 28 of 1961.

15. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, No. 13 of 2013.